lawsuit

Federal Court Dismisses Students for Justice in Palestine Lawsuit Against University of Vermont

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by the University of Vermont’s (UVM) Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) chapter, ending a months-long legal battle over the university’s response to the group’s April 2024 encampment protest. The protest, which took place on UVM’s Davis Center Green, was part of a nationwide wave of demonstrations against Israel’s actions in Gaza.

The encampment, which began on April 28 and voluntarily ended on May 8, grew to include nearly 80 tents and hundreds of participants. However, the protest also drew scrutiny for violating campus policies, including the unauthorized use of university property and the construction of temporary structures without permits. These violations led to the university placing the SJP chapter on interim suspension—a decision that sparked the lawsuit.

SJP’s Lawsuit: Claims of Civil Rights Violations

In September 2024, UVM’s SJP chapter filed a lawsuit alleging that the university’s suspension violated their First Amendment rights. The group argued that their encampment was a form of protected protest and claimed that UVM had selectively enforced its policies. According to the filing, no other student groups participating in similar activities were subjected to the same disciplinary measures.

SJP called the suspension an “egregious violation” of their civil rights and sought to have it overturned in court. However, U.S. District Court Judge William Sessions found otherwise.

The Court’s Decision

On December 19, Judge Sessions dismissed the case, siding with the university’s argument that the suspension was justified based on clear policy violations. In his written decision, Sessions highlighted the university’s “reasonable concerns” regarding safety and security, which were addressed by the policies in question.

“The policy in question addressed two well-established institutional interests: safety and security,” Sessions wrote, affirming that the university acted within its rights in enforcing its regulations.

Aftermath for SJP and UVM

Following the court’s ruling, UVMSJP issued a statement expressing disappointment but vowing to continue its activism. “We are disappointed by the dismissal of our lawsuit, but we will return to campus with resilience and strength,” the group said.

Although the group’s suspension has ended, they remain on probation for the remainder of the academic year. Under probation, the organization will be closely monitored, and any additional policy violations could result in harsher sanctions, including a potential suspension.

The University of Vermont has not issued a formal statement about the court’s decision but has consistently maintained that its actions were based on safety concerns and the enforcement of campus policies, not a suppression of free speech.

A Broader Debate

The case has drawn attention as part of the larger conversation about free speech, activism, and university policies on college campuses. Critics of UVM’s actions argue that universities should provide more flexibility for student activism, while supporters believe that enforcing policies is essential to maintaining order and safety.

As the SJP chapter resumes its activities on campus, the case serves as a reminder of the delicate balance universities must strike between supporting student expression and enforcing institutional rules. For now, the court’s ruling has set a clear precedent: student protests are welcome, but not when they break the rules.

Skip to content